RENANTCLOUD
Find hosting
CHOOSE YOUR PATHHelp me choosePlain-language workload finderTechnical catalogCompare normalized specificationsProduct guideUnderstand VPS, cloud, GPU, and bare metalProvider standardsQualification, evidence, and quote checksHosting locationsChoose a region around your users
IPv4 exchangeHow pricing worksPartners
Resources
RESOURCESDocumentationProduct and orchestration conceptsService statusCustomer notices and incident methodologySupportBuyer guidance and customer helpAbout UsOur purpose, principles, and operating model
Customer access
FIND HOSTINGHelp me chooseTechnical catalogProduct guideProvider standardsHosting locationsIPv4 exchangeHow pricing worksPartnersRESOURCESDocumentationService statusSupportAbout UsACCOUNTCreate accountCustomer access
ACCEPTABLE USE / PRE-LAUNCH DRAFT

Protect the customer without exporting harm to the network.

This draft sets practical boundaries for workloads, access, network behavior, downstream customers, and abuse response. It is not yet in force and does not claim active monitoring.

STATUSPre-launch working draft
Effective date
Not set
Contract status
Not in force
Review needed
Legal and operational
NOT YET EFFECTIVEThis draft is published for pre-launch review and does not create a service, transaction, SLA, provider relationship, or legal commitment.
LEGAL DOCUMENTSPrivacy draftPersonal data and requestsService terms draftAccounts, quotes, and servicesAcceptable use draftNetwork and workload rulesIPv4 leasing draftAuthority, routing, and return
COMPANYRENANT LIMITED

Hong Kong

Company details
Review copy—not legal advice

This document describes intended controls and customer expectations so the product can be reviewed coherently. RENANT LIMITED must obtain appropriate legal, tax, regulatory, and provider-contract review before adopting it with an effective date.

01

Purpose, scope, and status

This is a pre-launch working draft for services that may be coordinated by RENANT LIMITED under the Renant name. It is intended to apply to customers, account users, downstream resellers, affiliates where relevant, suppliers using a portal, and anyone using assigned infrastructure or Internet-number resources.

The final Acceptable Use Policy should form part of an accepted service agreement and may include provider- or country-specific rules. If an upstream provider imposes a stricter lawful restriction on a selected service, that restriction should be disclosed before order where practical and may also apply.

No monitoring claim

This draft describes controls Renant intends to establish. It does not state that traffic inspection, abuse feeds, reputation checks, automated suspension, or a staffed incident desk is currently operational.

02

The core rule

Do not use a Renant-coordinated service to break the law, deceive or harm another person, interfere with a network or system, evade a legitimate restriction, or create unreasonable risk for other customers, providers, address holders, or the public Internet.

A customer remains responsible for its users, software, credentials, content, traffic, and downstream customers. Lack of awareness does not remove the obligation to investigate warning signs and secure a compromised service.

03

Malware, intrusion, and security abuse

The following would be prohibited unless an activity is expressly authorized in writing by the system owner and permitted by the selected provider:

  • Deploying or controlling malware, ransomware, spyware, botnets, cryptominers installed without consent, exploit kits, credential stealers, or command-and-control infrastructure.
  • Attempting unauthorized access, privilege escalation, password attacks, credential stuffing, token theft, interception, or security-control bypass.
  • Scanning, probing, exploiting, load testing, or denial-of-service testing systems without documented authorization and a scope designed to protect uninvolved networks.
  • Launching, amplifying, relaying, coordinating, selling, or threatening denial-of-service attacks.
  • Hosting phishing, impersonation, malicious redirects, deceptive downloads, or infrastructure intended to obtain secrets or funds dishonestly.
  • Concealing or materially misrepresenting the origin, controller, purpose, or target of abusive activity.

Good-faith security research is not automatically authorized by this policy. Obtain permission from the system owner and confirm the infrastructure provider's rules before testing.

04

Messaging, automation, and unwanted traffic

  • Do not send unsolicited bulk messages, operate spam infrastructure, harvest contact details, or use purchased or unlawfully obtained recipient lists.
  • Do not forge message headers, identities, consent records, unsubscribe results, or domain authentication.
  • Automated requests, scraping, crawling, and bots must respect applicable law, authorization, technical limits, and the rights of the target service.
  • Open relays, open proxies, recursive resolvers, and similar services must not be left in a configuration that enables third-party abuse.

Legitimate transactional email, customer-authorized campaigns, monitoring, and automation may still be subject to rate limits, consent rules, provider policies, and evidence requirements.

05

Illegal, deceptive, and rights-infringing material

A service must not be used to create, store, publish, advertise, sell, distribute, or facilitate material or conduct that is unlawful in an applicable jurisdiction. This includes content that infringes intellectual-property or privacy rights, enables fraud, facilitates exploitation, or is subject to a binding removal order.

RENANT LIMITED should not decide complex ownership or speech disputes solely from an unsupported allegation. A complete report, counter-notice or response where appropriate, and the obligations of the selected provider and applicable law should inform action.

06

Network and routing integrity

  • Do not spoof source addresses, announce a prefix or ASN without authority, leak routes, hijack routes, or publish a false route object or ROA.
  • Do not create, alter, extend, or reuse a letter of authorization without the authority of the relevant resource holder and all required parties.
  • Do not evade blocks or reputation controls by rapidly rotating addresses, domains, accounts, providers, or identities.
  • Do not interfere with another tenant, bypass isolation, exhaust shared control-plane resources, or attack provider management systems.
  • Reverse DNS, geolocation, registry, route, and abuse-contact data supplied to Renant must be accurate and kept current.

IPv4 users must also follow the draft IPv4 Leasing Policy.

07

Resource integrity and fair use

A customer must remain within the resource, transfer, port, API, storage, and usage limits in its accepted order. “Unmetered” or a stated port speed should not be interpreted as permission to impair a shared network or as a guarantee of sustained throughput unless the order expressly says so.

Activities such as public proxies, VPN services, remote desktops, game servers, mass messaging, automated browsers, financial or crypto workloads, security testing, scraping, and regulated content may be legitimate but carry different provider, licensing, compliance, and abuse risks. They may require a compatible upstream provider, additional verification, or written approval; the website should not imply universal support.

08

Downstream resellers and customer administration

A reseller must:

  • Identify and authorize each customer before provisioning and maintain accurate account and abuse contacts.
  • Give customers terms at least as protective as the applicable Renant and upstream rules.
  • Keep tenants separated and disclose only the data needed to operate each account.
  • Respond promptly to security and abuse inquiries and preserve relevant evidence lawfully.
  • Not advertise ownership, certifications, capacity, locations, SLAs, or provider affiliations it cannot substantiate.

The reseller is responsible for activity it authorizes and for reasonable steps to stop repeated abuse by its customers.

09

Reporting suspected abuse

Use the pre-launch infrastructure abuse intake. It records a notice for manual review but is not yet a staffed abuse desk or emergency channel. A useful report includes the affected IP address or service, precise timestamps with timezone, relevant headers or logs, the observed behavior, the reporter's relationship to the affected system, and a safe reply route.

Do not include passwords, private keys, full payment-card data, unnecessary identity documents, or unrelated personal information. Reports should be made honestly; knowingly fabricated or manipulated evidence is prohibited.

10

Investigation and proportionate response

The intended response process is:

  1. Record and deduplicate the report.
  2. Assess source, timestamps, scope, severity, recurrence, and available provider evidence.
  3. Notify the responsible account and request containment or explanation where safe and practical.
  4. Apply the least disruptive measure reasonably capable of reducing the risk.
  5. Escalate, restrict, suspend, preserve evidence, or terminate when urgency, repeated breach, law, or provider action requires it.
  6. Record the decision and provide a review route where appropriate.

Immediate action may be necessary for active compromise, serious harm, route hijack, large-scale attack, a binding legal demand, or a provider emergency. Automated reputation signals should inform investigation but should not be the sole basis for irreversible action without an appropriate review.

11

Remediation and repeated violations

Reasonable remediation may include isolating a system, rotating credentials, removing malicious material, patching software, restricting ports, correcting routes or DNS, changing an IP assignment, providing consent evidence, or completing a security plan.

Repeated or evasive violations, failure to contain a compromised system, retaliation against reporters, or movement of the same abuse between services may justify stronger action. Restoration remains dependent on safety, provider approval, outstanding charges, and the final service terms.

12

Privacy, evidence, and changes

Investigation data should be limited to what is relevant, protected by role, retained for a justified period, and handled under the adopted Privacy Notice. Traffic content should not be inspected by default; any inspection must have authority, necessity, proportionality, and an appropriate notice or exception.

An effective policy should carry a publication date, change history, and any provider-specific schedules. Active customers should receive the notice required by their contract and applicable law before a material non-emergency change applies.

RENANT LIMITED
3906, 39/F, THE CENTER, 99
QUEEN'S ROAD, CENTRAL
HONG KONG

QUESTIONS OR CORRECTIONS

Raise a policy question before relying on this draft.

Use the contact page and identify the policy and section involved. Do not submit passwords, private keys, payment-card data, identity documents, or confidential network credentials through a general inquiry form.

Open the contact directory
START / 01

Describe the workload. Keep the choice understandable.

Help me choose
RENANTCLOUD

Independent hosting guidance, transparent quotes, and coordinated delivery across selected infrastructure providers.

Choose

Guided finderTechnical catalogProduct guideIPv4 exchange

Transparency

Provider standardsHosting locationsPricing modelService status

Partners

Infrastructure suppliersDownstream resellersAffiliate programPartner workspace previews

Company

About RenantCreate accountDocumentationSupportContact
© 2026 RENANT LIMITEDIndependent hosting guidance and orchestration
CompanyContactPrivacyTerms